The biggest difference between the two is definitely the noise of the vacuum, though we think it’s a worthwhile trade-off. It’s hard to say if the Panasonic was working better for us because of a stronger motor or just because of the vacuum drawing hair into the blades, but it did seem to snip hairs a little bit more readily. Some of these are more expensive, some are a bit cheaper, but unless you’re buying from eBay or Aliexpress you’re not saving any money by going for lesser-known brands.Īs you can see from the image above, the ToiletTree trimmer (with the white post) uses a very similar cutter to Panasonic’s, so it has similar advantages. The real competition for Panasonic’s trimmer is the ToiletTree trimmer. This is compared to around 0.3 amps for the others, which means Panasonic will gain more runtime from better battery chemistry. You’d see an increase with other trimmers, too, but the 90-minute runtime on an alkaline indicates that the Panasonic is pulling just less than 1 ampere of power. See Price at See Price at Īs mentioned in our testing section, you should see much better run-times with this powerful little motor if you switch to high-capacity nickel metal hydride batteries like these Amazon Basics, Eneloop Pro or Ansmann cells. The ER430K also comes with a handy vacuum feature. Panasonic is one of the few manufacturers trying a different cutting blade in this classic design, and it's a real improvement over the average trimmer. The vacuum feature is handy enough that we think the ER430K is worth an extra $5, and it also comes with a cap and zippered case to keep it clean. Panasonic lists the same 90-minute runtime for the cheaper model that we got with the vacuum-powered ER430K, but they might just be giving a conservative estimate. If you don’t care about the vacuum feature and want to save $5, the ERGN30K uses the same great blade and should be just as easy to clean. The instruction left us uncertain about whether this is intended, but the vacuum-free ERGN30K model lists this as a feature called “vortex cleaning.” The manual says to clean the trimmer with the motor off, but if you do run it while submerged it’ll scrub the blades really well with a fast-flowing stream of water drawn through by the vacuum system. When you’re cleaning this trimmer, it takes less work to clean out gunk because of the flow-through design that allows the vacuum to grab hairs. Fortunately, this is one of the best trimmers we tried, and the price is right in the middle of the range. If this trimmer weren’t great at doing what it says on the box, we wouldn’t recommend it specifically because of the vacuum. Not satisfied to simply trim your nose hair, it also uses a tiny vacuum to collect the hairs in a little trap for later disposal. The Panasonic – ER430K is a more complicated nose hair trimmer than most. Also great is the Philips – NT1500, which proved it’s a better detail trimmer than it is a nose hair trimmer. The ER430K is fully waterproof, so it’s easy to clean and keeps batteries dry. This is a refined improvement of the classic trimmer design, with a better blade and a vacuum to keep crusty clippings off your shirt. After two months of testing eight different designs, we’ve picked the Panasonic – ER430K as the best nose hair trimmer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |